Apr 4

Commonwealth v. O.L.

Commonwealth v. O.L.

Philadelphia police officers received a radio call reporting that there was a man inside of a bar at 52nd and Webster wearing an army fatigue jacket who was in possession of a firearm. Officers responded to the bar and saw O.L. seated inside and matching the description of the person with the gun. One of the officers conducted a “safety frisk” on O.L. and recovered a firearm out of his pocket. Rather than accept an offer to plead guilty in exchange for a 5-10 year prison sentence, the defense filed a motion to suppress evidence arguing that the US and PA constitutions prohibit a frisk under these circumstances. Because the radio call came from an anonymous source and there was no independent basis for the officers to believe that O.L. was in possession of a firearm, the police were not allowed to stop, detain, or frisk O.L. The Judge suppressed the firearm from evidence, forcing the Commonwealth to withdraw charges against O.L.

Loading Facebook Comments ...

No comments yet.

Leave a Comment

reset all fields